WESTMINSTER-I support rescinding the town manager form of government in Westminster because I believe a town administrator model would better serve the town's needs.
Under Vermont law, the authority of a town manager derives directly from state statute and operates with a high degree of independence from the Selectboard.
By contrast, a town administrator works at the direction of and in closer partnership with the Selectboard, allowing elected officials to remain actively involved in operational decision-making when they choose to do so. This structure can provide greater accountability and flexibility, particularly for communities that prefer hands-on governance.
Most towns in Windham County operate with a town administrator rather than a town manager. Westminster's administrative budget allocates $328,776 for salaries, compared to $95,908 in neighboring Dummerston. While every town's needs differ, this comparison raises important questions about cost efficiency.
A town administrator would serve as a liaison between the Selectboard, town employees, and the public - improving communication and efficiency without creating an additional layer of bureaucracy. The town could potentially save more than 10% in FY27 by eliminating the town manager position and adopting a town administrator system.
Westminster has a highly capable administrative assistant who could transition into a town administrator role, ensuring continuity and institutional knowledge during this period of change.
As the town begins the search for a new town manager, this transition presents a timely opportunity to re-examine our governance structure and determine the most efficient and effective way to conduct town business.
John Ewald
Westminster
This letter to the editor was submitted to The Commons.
This piece, published in print in the Voices section or as a column in the news sections, represents the opinion of the writer. In the newspaper and on this website, we strive to ensure that opinions are based on fair expression of established fact. In the spirit of transparency and accountability, The Commons is reviewing and developing more precise policies about editing of opinions and our role and our responsibility and standards in fact-checking our own work and the contributions to the newspaper. In the meantime, we heartily encourage civil and productive responses at voices@commonsnews.org.