SAXTONS RIVER-If we want to have a real, productive (pun intended) discussion about replacing the birthing center and OB-GYN services we are losing at Brattleboro Memorial Hospital, we have to talk about the actual financial mechanics.
Right now, there is an urgent, necessary community push to keep the current birthing center open through emergency funding or political pressure. We absolutely must support this to protect local families immediately. But if we don't look ahead, we will find ourselves in this exact same spot a year from today. Just asking “How do we open another one?” or how to keep this one open indefinitely isn’t enough, because we need to look at the business models and the state funding systems that govern local healthcare. Sustainability is economic as much as it is environmental. (Don’t make me bust out my master’s capstone.)
As a local real estate agent, I see the direct economic domino effect of this decision every day. If we lose local labor and delivery services, we are severely damaging Brattleboro’s economic future. We cannot retain the younger generations who grew up here, nor can we attract the young families we desperately need to move in, buy homes, support our local businesses, and fill our schools.
Here are my two ideas for possible models for a birthing center in Brattleboro:
1. A private/for-profit model: This would allow for agile business operations, but to survive the high costs of malpractice insurance and specialized staff, a private practice would be forced to heavily rely on premier private insurance or out-of-pocket cash pay.
Question: Is it possible for a private practice to be financially stable while also accepting Medicaid when the payouts are notoriously lower than the actual cost of care?
2. A nonprofit/community model: This allows for grant funding and donations.
Question: Would there be enough donations, fundraising vessels, and a donor pool big enough for the metrics that BMH posted? BMH’s obstetrics unit lost $3.8 million in 2025 and is on track to lose $4.8 million this year.
The underlying issue always comes back to how Vermont handles healthcare financing. Medicaid and Dr. Dynasaur cover a huge portion of births in our region, but the state’s reimbursement rates are notoriously low.
How can any independent model succeed in Brattleboro when the state’s Medicaid reimbursement structure actively penalizes low-margin, high-risk rural maternal care? Is the only real path forward forcing a structural change at the state level through the Green Mountain Care Board, or is there a financial framework we are missing?
Kate Barry
Saxtons River
This letter to the editor was submitted to The Commons.
This piece, published in print in the Voices section or as a column in the news sections, represents the opinion of the writer. In the newspaper and on this website, we strive to ensure that opinions are based on fair expression of established fact. In the spirit of transparency and accountability, The Commons is reviewing and developing more precise policies about editing of opinions and our role and our responsibility and standards in fact-checking our own work and the contributions to the newspaper. In the meantime, we heartily encourage civil and productive responses at voices@commonsnews.org.