Cornell got our anger. Survivors need our attention.

The Women's Freedom Center (womensfreedomcenter.net) works in Windham and southern Windsor counties to end domestic and sexual violence. You can reach an advocate on their 24-hour crisis line at 802-254-6954. Because of the sensitive and often dangerous nature of their work, we offer the Freedom Center contributors rare anonymity in these pages.

BRATTLEBORO-Is a sexual assault worth our outrage only when it's this extreme?

According to a civil lawsuit filed against Cornell University, a young woman identified as Jane Doe was sexually assaulted by seven men over a period of hours, and her body was used as a surface for drugs.

The Guardian reported that one of the men advertised her, unconscious, to a Snapchat group chat of about 50 fraternity brothers as "free p-ssy upstairs."

The lawsuit alleges the university never contacted Ithaca police. Two of the men were expelled. The other five were assigned essays.

Once the lawsuit became public, the response was immediate. People online and in newsrooms demanded to know who the seven men were, who was in that group chat, and who at Cornell decided an essay would be an adequate response to rape.

The Tompkins County District Attorney's Office opened an investigation. Ithaca Mayor Robert G. Cantelmo publicly condemned the university for failing to involve police and called its handling of the situation a "miscarriage of justice." Social media users are now taking credit for one of the men losing his job at Wells Fargo.

That pressure worked, and it should continue. But from where we sit at the Women's Freedom Center, one question keeps coming up: What if all that energy had gone to Jane Doe herself?

Her attorney told CNN that she wanted to leave Cornell after the assault but was denied tuition reimbursement. Thousands of people tracked down the names, photos, and employers of the men involved. Far less attention went to what she needed to rebuild her life.

If Cornell could expel two of those men, why couldn't it put their tuition toward her bill?

* * *

The gap - between holding to account someone who causes harm and helping the person who was harmed - is something we see all the time. And it is not unique to Cornell.

Sexual violence happens on campuses and in high schools, in homes and workplaces, and here in southern Vermont. Most survivors will never have a case that makes national news. There will be no headlines demanding justice for them. What they face instead are hard, practical choices, and those choices often decide whether they report at all.

Consider what that can look like here:

• Federal law requires that a sexual assault forensic exam be provided at no cost, but the care around it, like an ambulance ride, an X-ray or a prescription, can still come with a bill.

• At a small, rural hospital, the nurse or the person in the waiting room may be someone you know.

• If the person who hurt you shares your home, reporting could cost you your housing, and the wait for subsidized housing can stretch past two years.

• If you're struggling with substance use, talking to police may not feel possible, and treatment can cost thousands of dollars you don't have.

• If you've been through a courtroom before without a lawyer while the other side had one, you may have promised yourself never to go back.

• And if you're a student who has already paid for the year, staying may mean sitting in class with the person who raped you.

None of these survivors is deciding whether what happened to them was serious. They're deciding how to get through the next week.

* * *

At the Women's Freedom Center we believe survivors, whether they come forward the next day or 10 years later, and whether they ever want to set foot in a courtroom. We don't tell people what to do.

Our job is to make sure they have real options: a safe place to sleep, someone who answers the phone at 2 a.m., and an advocate who is still there after the immediate crisis has passed.

None of that undoes what happened. But it can change what happens next.

Prevention matters, too. It means teaching consent throughout young people's lives; it can't be something we talk about once in a health class or at a freshman orientation and then leave behind. Young people need to hear, over and over, what consent looks like - and what it doesn't. Someone who is drunk, silent, or frozen has not consented.

And sometimes prevention is as simple, and as difficult, as one person in a group of 50 deciding to get help instead of watching what happens next.

* * *

Institutions have work to do as well. Schools, colleges, employers, and hospitals need to look honestly at what happens when someone reports, and they need to ask whether their policies protect the person who came forward or mainly protect the institution.

Cornell is now facing a high-profile lawsuit, pressure from donors, and public condemnation from its own city's mayor. The attention on the university has shown something important: public pressure can move institutions.

In a matter of days, people demanded answers, a prosecutor opened an investigation, and a major university was forced to account publicly for how it handled a sexual assault.

That anger matters.

But what happens when the headlines disappear?

What happens to the person sitting in a hospital emergency department in Brattleboro? The student wondering whether she can stay at school? The parent trying to figure out where she and her children will sleep tonight? The person who isn't ready to report? The person who never will?

* * *

So, keep asking questions of Cornell. Keep demanding accountability from institutions that fail survivors.

And then bring that same energy home to the survivors in our own towns, by funding the services they depend on, showing up when a friend discloses, and asking local schools and employers what actually happens when someone reports.

One place to start: on Wednesday, Oct. 7, from 6 to 8 p.m., the Women's Freedom Center will hold a silent candlelight vigil for survivors on the Brattleboro Town Common. All are welcome.

* * *

This Voices Viewpoint was submitted to The Commons.

This piece, published in print in the Voices section or as a column in the news sections, represents the opinion of the writer. In the newspaper and on this website, we strive to ensure that opinions are based on fair expression of established fact. In the spirit of transparency and accountability, The Commons is reviewing and developing more precise policies about editing of opinions and our role and our responsibility and standards in fact-checking our own work and the contributions to the newspaper. In the meantime, we heartily encourage civil and productive responses at voices@commonsnews.org.