BRATTLEBORO

Weather

View 7-day forecast

Weather sponsored by

Your support powers every story we tell. Please help us reach our year-end goal.

Donate Now

Your support powers every story we tell. We're committed to producing high-quality, fact-based news and information that gives you the facts in this community we call home. If our work has helped you stay informed, take action, or feel more connected to Windham County – please give now to help us reach our goal of raising $150,000 by December 31st.

BRATTLEBORO

Weather

View 7-day forecast

Weather sponsored by

Your support powers every story we tell. Please help us reach our year-end goal.

Donate Now

Your support powers every story we tell. We're committed to producing high-quality, fact-based news and information that gives you the facts in this community we call home. If our work has helped you stay informed, take action, or feel more connected to Windham County – please give now to help us reach our goal of raising $150,000 by December 31st.

Voices

A math error?

Well put, Edward Jaffe [“Perfection: political tactic or prerequisite?,” Point/Counterpoint, Oct. 19] .

But I wonder why you wrote, “Multiply 10 years by 103 really old plants” NRC commercial reactor license extensions are for 20 years! (The original license period of 40 years was intended to be a really long time, beyond which no one would ever consider operation.)

I live near yet another Fukushima-style General Electric reactor, Pilgrim, in Massachusetts. Being able to buy home insurance against a reactor disaster won't make industry safety claims credible to me; having my home fully insured by the reactor operator would.

Why should residents have to pay to insure themselves against their hazard?

Subscribe to receive free email delivery of The Commons!