BRATTLEBORO

Weather

View 7-day forecast

Weather sponsored by

Your support powers every story we tell. Please help us reach our year-end goal.

Donate Now

Your support powers every story we tell. We're committed to producing high-quality, fact-based news and information that gives you the facts in this community we call home. If our work has helped you stay informed, take action, or feel more connected to Windham County – please give now to help us reach our goal of raising $150,000 by December 31st.

BRATTLEBORO

Weather

View 7-day forecast

Weather sponsored by

Your support powers every story we tell. Please help us reach our year-end goal.

Donate Now

Your support powers every story we tell. We're committed to producing high-quality, fact-based news and information that gives you the facts in this community we call home. If our work has helped you stay informed, take action, or feel more connected to Windham County – please give now to help us reach our goal of raising $150,000 by December 31st.

Voices

Fundamentally undemocratic efforts to control state energy policy



BRATTLEBORO-In March, Vermont Public Service Commissioner Kerrick Johnson stated on Vermont Public's Vermont Edition: "Vermonters should be able to determine [Vermont's] energy portfolio." Fair enough, though he and Gov. Phil Scott seem to have gone ahead and made that determination for us.

As reported in the Connecticut Mirror, on Sept. 30, at the National Governors Association's 2026 New England Regional Nuclear Policy Summit in Lowell, Massachusetts, after noting that other New England states don't want to be the first to use small modular reactors, the commissioner went for it.

"The community agrees, we and our department agree, the state, our governor agrees, and the region, initially, agrees," he said. Further, "The collaborative role we can serve - as Vermont has traditionally served - is to go first."

This is a rather large commitment to be making to the rest of the New England governors without first asking someone, somewhere in Vermont.

Johnson and Gov. Scott do seem to have their doubts, however, about the extent of the community's support for nuclear power, whichever "community" he may be referring to.

The Scott administration has repeatedly proposed legislation that would rebrand the Renewable Energy Standard as the "Clean Energy Standard," rebrand nuclear power as "clean," and thereby, with the stroke of a pen, rebrand nuclear power as "renewable" - a very imaginative solution to the many problems of nuclear power if wholly in contradiction to the laws of physics.

Just to make sure, though, that the community it claims supports nuclear power actually supports nuclear power, the administration has at the same time as its rebranding efforts repeatedly asked the Vermont General Assembly to remove the requirement that the Public Utility Commission obtain legislative approval before issuing a Certificate of Public Good for the construction of a nuclear power plant!

These shenanigans by the Scott administration are less about nuclear power than they are about its fundamentally undemocratic efforts to control the state's energy policy. The administration should stop working for the interests of the utilities and start working for the interests of Vermont citizens.

Schuyler Gould

Brattleboro


This letter to the editor was submitted to The Commons.

This piece, published in print in the Voices section or as a column in the news sections, represents the opinion of the writer. In the newspaper and on this website, we strive to ensure that opinions are based on fair expression of established fact. In the spirit of transparency and accountability, The Commons is reviewing and developing more precise policies about editing of opinions and our role and our responsibility and standards in fact-checking our own work and the contributions to the newspaper. In the meantime, we heartily encourage civil and productive responses at voices@commonsnews.org.

Subscribe to receive free email delivery of The Commons!